Month: April 2012

Bible

More evolution in the Amplified bible

The Amplified is not an accurate translation. For instance in Genesis 1 lets look at a few verses: 5And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day. 8And God called the firmament Heavens. And there was evening and there was morning, a […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

New American Standard Bible

I find it amusing that people usually claim that the New American Standard Bible is very close to the original greek and Hebrew, it seems they dont tell us exactly which Hebrew that is. The New Testament for the NASB is the Novum Testamentum Graece of Nestle-Aland while the Old Testament is Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

Pericope Adulterae was in the bible. Dont be fooled

The Pericope Adulterae was originally in the bible. Dont know what this is? Well the Pericope Adulterae is debated by many people to not be part of the original new testament, it being the scripture part of the woman taken in adultery. Joh 8:1  Jesus went unto the mount of Olives. Joh 8:2  And early […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

1989 The first gender neutral language introduced to the bible in the NRSV

In 1989 the National Council of Churches in the US ordered one of the many “full-scale” revisions of the RSV and this time they went even further than just removing the virgin birth. They add the use of gender neutral language. Today we have the most corrupted versions that ever existed, like the TNIV that […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

The New Revised Standard version is ecumenical

From the official “to the reader” of the NSRV and i believe it is in the Revised Standard Version as well. This bible version and those associated with it is clearly ecumenical as they self confess. The Revised Standard Version Bible Committee is a continuing body, comprising about thirty members, both men and women. Ecumenical […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

NRSV: To the Reader

This seems to be the New Revised Standard Version’s “To the reader” page. Once again i dont agree with this KJV bashing but i’m posting this for reference and for people to read the view of Bruze M Metzger the “widely regarded parent of the RSV and NSRV” as you can see in the quotation. […]

CONTINUE READING
Bible

Preface to the RSV says KJV has "serious defects"

According to the preface of the Revised Standard Version the King James bible has serious “defects”. Obviously someone does not know what a real defect is, such as a poor attempt to make another bible version. Here is what they had to say in the preface:

CONTINUE READING
Bible

D.A Carson lied in the book King James Version Debate

D.A Carsen said in 1979 in the book “The King James Version Debate” that “The ante-Nicene fathers unambigously cited every text type except the Byzantine. This is not true and its a blatant lie. There are many Byzantine text type quotes by the “early church fathers”. The lies continue even today as many people quote […]

CONTINUE READING