Skip to content

Topic: United NationsSyndicate content

UN Climate change fraud moving to Bonn in May

 What we can be sure to call the biggest scandal of our time, global warming; the UN is still on a mission to convince countries to pay up the taxes.

Eritrea - A year after her arrest, Radio Bana journalist being held in solitary confinement

February 18, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

Reporters Without Borders has just learned from credible Eritrean sources that journalist and essayist Yirgalem Fisseha Mebrahtu has been held in solitary confinement for the past few weeks in May Srwa prisons, to the north of Asmara. It is not known why she is being given this treatment.

“The Eritrean government has yet again demonstrated its cruelty,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Yirgalem Fisseha is on the point of completing a year of being held incommunicado in particularly appalling conditions. We are very concerned for her state of health and we urge the international community to react and to demand her release and the release of the 20 or so other journalists detained in Eritrea.”

Employed by Asmara-based Radio Bana, Yirgalem Fisseha was arrested when the authorities raided the station on 22 February 2009 and detained its entire staff. Initially taken to Adi Abeito military prison, to the northwest of the capital, she was subsequently transferred to the nearby May Srwa prison. One of her Radio Bana colleagues, Bereket Misghina, and the young writer and poet Meles Negusse Kifu, are being held in the same prison.

Originally from Adi Keyih, a city to the south of Asmara, not far from the Ethiopian border, and a graduate of Asmara Teachers' Training College, Yirgalem Fisseha was one of the few women working as journalists in Eritrea. Before the government closed down all independent media in September 2001, she was an art critic for the privately-owned weekly Zemen as well as writing for the state-owned daily Hadas Eritrea and Tirgita, a newspaper that supported the National Union of Eritrean Youth and Students (NUEYS).

Zemen editor Amanuel Asrat, who was arrested on 18 September 2001, is currently being held in Eiraeiro prison camp (in cell No. 25) along with freelance journalist Seyoum Tsehaye (cell No. 10) and Dawit Habtemichael, deputy editor and co-founder of Meqaleh (cell No. 12).

In a letter on 11 January to Manfred Nowak, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Reporters Without Borders wrote: “We urge you to request access to the imprisoned journalists in order to enquire about their state of health and about prison conditions in Eritrea (...) We also ask you and your fellow rapporteurs to put enough pressure on the government to ensure that they are tried or released.”

Read the letter.

Cuba - Reporters Without Borders correspondent turns 60 in prison

February 18, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

In poor health ever since his arrest in 2003, the Reporters Without Borders Cuba correspondent, Ricardo González Alfonso is today “celebrating” his 60th birthday in jail. Sentenced to 20 years in prison just for doing his job, González has had to endure the harassment and mistreatment that is standard fare for Cuban prisoners of conscience.

González founded and ran the Manuel Márquez Sterling training centre for independent journalists and edited the independent biweekly De Cuba. He won the 2008 Reporters Without Borders press freedom prize in the “journalist” category.

He was arrested on 18 March 2008 during an unprecedented government crackdown on dissidents that is now known as the “Black Spring.” Tried on 4 April 2003 with his friend, poet and fellow-journalist Raúl Rivero, he was convicted of being an “agent in the pay of the United States” although no evidence was produced to support this charge.

Nineteen of the 25 journalists currently imprisoned in Cuba were arrested during the same “Black Spring” crackdown and are serving sentences ranging from 14 to 27 years in prison.

Despite serious health problems, especially lung ailments, González continues to be held in a cell in Havana's Combinado del Este prison. After undergoing four operations in 2006 and 2007 and a long spell in hospital, he was returned to his prison cell on 27 January 2008 although still in very poor health. On 26 January of this year, he finally received treatment for which he had been waiting for months.

Like other political prisoners, he has been held in collective cells along with ordinary offenders and, as a result, has been exposed to harassment and violence from cellmates. “We hold the government responsible for Ricardo's health,” his wife, Alida Viso Bello, said.

There has been no let-up in government harassment of dissidents, especially bloggers, since Raúl Castro took over as president on 24 February 2008. In the latest case, dissident journalist Carlos Serpa Maceira reported at the start of this month that he had been banished to the Isle of Youth after being arrested and beaten.

The Cuban government's signing of the UN's two conventions on civil and political rights, including freedom of expression, has not been followed by any sign of an improvement in respect for human rights. Like all the other imprisoned journalists, González must be freed.

Photo : WordPress

Nepal: Authorities must provide justice for torture and murder of 15-year-old Maina Sunuwar

February 17, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

International and local human rights organisations have today urged the Nepali authorities to stop obstructing criminal proceedings over the alleged torture and murder of 15-year-old Maina Sunuwar by four army officers.

An open letter to the Attorney General of Nepal, Professor Bharat Bahadur Karki, on the sixth anniversary of Maina Sunwar’s death, calls on him to end ongoing obstructions to bringing the officers to trial.

They are accused of subjecting Maina to prolonged simulated drowning and electrocution with a 220-volt current, which led to her death. Her body was secretly buried but later exhumed at an army barracks where Nepali UN peacekeepers are trained.

‘Nepal’s politicians continually talk about taking the peace process to its ‘logical conclusion’ but what is ‘logical’ about a peace process that allows those accused of killing a young girl to remain free? Or law enforcement agencies that do not respect the law courts?’, said Mandira Sharma, Director of Advocacy Forum - Nepal.

The letter coincides with the release of a comprehensive analysis of the case by the Nepali NGO, Advocacy Forum.

These two documents highlight multiple failings by the government to investigate and prosecute those responsible for Maina’s murder along with hundreds of others during the country’s decade long conflict between Maoists and the government which ended in 2006.

The organizations demand justice for Maina’s family after an inquiry conducted by the Nepal Army resulted in the court martial of three soldiers for only minor disciplinary offences.

Despite a September 2007 Supreme Court ruling that the case falls under civilian jurisdiction, and subsequent arrest warrants issued in January 2008 by the Kavre District Court, the Army is refusing to cooperate and police have failed to make arrests.  The Nepal Army is harbouring one of the four accused, Major Niranjan Basnet, instead of handing him over for trial.

 ‘The failure to arrest and prosecute those charged with Maina’s murder reveals all too clearly the longstanding weaknesses in the Nepal justice system. This makes a mockery of promises by politicians to address human rights abuses and end impunity as part of the peace process. The government must now ensure those accused of killing Maina are arrested and held accountable in a court of law’, said Donna Guest, Asia-Pacific Deputy Director, Amnesty International.

The repatriation to Nepal of Major Basnet from the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Chad on 12 December 2009 raised hopes that he would be arrested. Yet more than two months later the army continues to shield him and he has still not appeared before a court.

“A government that sends thousands of troops on UN peacekeeping duties must take steps to ensure no one accused of grave human rights violations is sent abroad. This is essential not only for the integrity of the Nepal Army, but for the credibility of the government in dealing with past human rights violations,” stated Birendra Thapaliya of FOHRID.

Contrary to instruction by the Prime Minister of Nepal, the Defence Minister, Bidhya Bhandari, has publicly taken the position that the Court Martial closed the matter. However, given that the Court Martial did not deal with torture and murder and chose the lesser charges of ‘indiscipline and not following procedures’, the accused have not yet been tried for the murder of Maina Sunuwar.

‘Taking a 15-year-old unarmed girl from her bed and torturing her to death by drowning and electrocution goes far beyond the disciplinary infractions considered by the Court Martial.  For such serious crimes, whether the suspects are State officials or Maoists, they must be held criminally responsible before an impartial and independent civilian tribunal,” stated Sushil Pyakhurel of the Accountability Watch Committee.

Maina’s death has come to embody the widespread injustice and failure of accountability experienced by thousands in Nepal today. Despite the focus on the Nepal Army in the killing of Maina, members of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) are also responsible for numerous human rights abuses during the conflict, abuses that remain equally unresolved.

“Failure to respect and comply with a decision of Nepal’s Supreme Court and to abide by valid arrest warrants sends a signal of lawlessness. Guaranteeing a judicial remedy and fair trial before a civilian court in this case will send the much-needed message that all are equal before the law, strengthening the foundation of Nepal’s peace process,” stated Roger Normand, Director of the International Commission of Jurists’ Asia Pacific Program.

Devi Sunuwar, Maina’s mother, said she hopes the resolution of the case will help end the cycle of impunity that has gripped Nepal.

‘Today, six years since my daughter Maina was murdered I feel great sadness for her loss, but also for the thousands of mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters across this country who face a similar struggle to find peace and justice’, said Devi Sunuwar.

Gordon Brown's uneducated global warming ramblings

Gordon Brown seems to forget the term "climategate", or maybe he's just never heard that global warming is one of the biggest scams of our time. The UK prime minister insisted someth

Afghan civilians at risk during NATO offensive against Taleban

February 16, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

   

Amnesty International calls on both sides to protect Afghan civilians as NATO and Afghan forces continue a major military offensive in the southern province of Helmand.

 

"About 10,000 civilians have fled the conflict zone, but thousands more are caught up in the fighting," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Director.

 

"Afghanistan is likely to witness heavier fighting this year than ever before, and last year the war already claimed more than 2,400 civilian casualties, the highest number since 2001. So it's crucial for all sides to take efforts to minimize harm to civilians."

 

Displaced residents have reported that the Taleban tried to prevent civilians from leaving the conflict area and in some instances have fired from, and sought shelter among the civilian population

 

The Taleban and other anti-government groups were responsible for some two-thirds of all civilian casualties and injuries last year, according to UN estimates.

 

 "The Taleban have a record of knowingly endangering Afghan civilians in their operations, which can constitute a war crime," Sam Zarifi said. "Insurgent groups are bound by international law to take every possible precaution to protect the lives of civilians. The Taleban invoke international laws of war when it suits their purposes. Their failure to respect these laws is inexcusable and they should be held to account for their actions."

 

Amnesty International also urged Afghan and international military forces to ensure they comply with their legal obligation to protect civilians from harm.

 

Operations by NATO forces have already lead to the deaths of at least 15 civilians in and around the Marjah region since the "Operation Moshtarak" ("Joint Command") offensive began on February 13th.

 

Twelve people, including six children, died after two US missiles struck a house on the outskirts of Marja district on Sunday. NATO has claimed that the attack was caused by a faulty missile system.

 

"The US and NATO have made commitments to minimise civilian casualties.  But international and Afghan forces still lack a consistent, clear and credible mechanism to investigate civilian casualties, provide accountability and ensure that such incidents do not recur," Sam Zarifi said. "This is now particularly urgent with more than 30,000 extra foreign troops deployed in Afghanistan and apparently committed to a more aggressive military strategy." 

 

Amnesty International also called on all warring parties to ensure that humanitarian assistance can reach needy civilians. The operation, which targets Marjah and Nad Ali districts of Helmand, has resulted in thousands of residents fleeing the conflict zone for Helmand's main town, Lashkar Gah, as well as to the towns of Kandahar and Herat.

 

The Afghan Department for Refugees and Returnees has reportedly registered more than 6,000 displaced people from Marja and Nad Ali since the operations were announced.

 

"We know that in other recent campaigns, thousands of displaced people have not been registered with the authorities, as they have chosen to stay with family and friends, often ignored or out of reach of humanitarian assistance," Sam Zarifi said.

 

Amnesty International calls upon the Afghan government and all relevant national and international aid agencies to provide immediate assistance for the displaced, including essential food and potable water, basic shelter, appropriate clothing and heating materials as well as essential medical services and sanitation, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement.

 

 

Iran - International community urged to face up to responsibilities during UN Human Rights Council's review of Iran

February 15, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

The United Nations Human Rights Council is to review the situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran on 15 February. Until now, Iran has escaped any kind of sanction since the Council's creation in March 2006. A firm decision by the international community, including China and the countries of the Islamic Conference, would help to induce Iran to respect its human rights undertakings.

When Iran was the first country to be reviewed by the Council in March 2007, the debate took place behind closed doors and the files were quickly classified after much bargaining among the various countries present. By using ideological and regionalist arguments with its “neighbours and friends,” Iran finally emerged unscathed.

Since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's disputed reelection on 12 June, 29 newspapers have been closed, more than 130 journalists have been arrested and more than 60 have been forced to leave the country. This is unprecedented since the Islamic Republic of Iran's creation.

Iran is now the world's biggest prison for the media with more than 80 journalists and netizens currently detained (48 journalists, 2 media assistants, 18 netizens, 7 other arrests announced by the intelligence ministry and 8 under investigation).

“The countries that say nothing about the bloody crackdown that has been taking place in Iran for the past eight months are accomplices to these crimes,” Reporters Without Borders said. “When the UN Human Rights Council conducts its Universal Periodic Review of Iran, it must show that it is up to the task. Its credibility must not be eroded yet again.”

The press freedom organisation added: “The Council must demand the release of all the political prisoners, including the journalists, and must ensure that the Iranian government respects the right to freedom of expression in practice.”

Since 2000, several UN special rapporteurs have formulated criticisms and recommendations regarding respect for human rights in Iran.

Following a visit to Iran from 15 to 27 February 2004, Louis Joinet, the head of the working group on arbitrary detention, published a damning report on the deterioration in the situation of human rights, including freedom of expression. He noted that solitary confinement for very long periods was widely used in Iran's prisons and could regarded as a “prison within prison,” one that lent itself to grave abuses. No action was even taken on Joinet's recommendations.

Ambeyi Ligabo, the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, urged Iran in January 2004 to bring its judicial procedures into line with international standards and to adopt a human rights charter. In particular, he said revolutionary courts should no longer try crimes of opinion and he called for the abolition of prison sentences for crimes of opinion and press offences.

The Islamic Republic has just been celebrating its 31st anniversary but its press freedom record during the past 31 years has been appalling. Several thousand newspapers have been closed since February 1979, hundreds of journalists have been arrested, hundreds have been sentenced to long jail terms and dozens have been summarily executed or murdered.

Since last June, the crackdown on criticism of the regime's political and religious institutions has created a climate of terror leading to self-censorship and the flight of many journalists into exile. When journalists are arrested, their most fundamental rights are flouted and they often subjected to long spells of being held incommunicado or in solitary confinement.

These periods of being held incommunicado can be regarded as forced disappearances and crimes against humanity and constitute violations of international law.

“The international community must now turn its words into actions,” Reporters Without Borders said, calling for the Iranian government to be censured for its serious human rights violations and calling for UN special rapporteurs to be sent to Iran as matter of urgency.

Iran’s report to UN paints distorted picture on human rights

February 12, 2010 by Anonymous

Anonymous's picture

The Iranian government’s view of the state of human rights in the country is severely distorted, Amnesty International said today in an analysis paper prepared ahead of a review of Iran by the UN Human Rights Council.

The Amnesty International paper was prepared in response to Iran’s own submission to the UN in the framework of the Universal Periodic Review. The UN Human Rights Council’s Working Group will evaluate Iran’s human rights record on 15 February.   

During the review, UN member states have the opportunity to raise questions about Iran’s human rights record and make recommendations to the Iranian government, which may then say which, if any, it will accept.

“The Iranian authorities seem either to have lost touch with reality or are unwilling to acknowledge it,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International. “The government report reads as if there is no human rights crisis, just politically motivated criticism.”

“UN member states must look at what is actually happening in Iran: mass arrests and detentions, beatings of peaceful demonstrators, torture and deaths in custody, ‘show trials’ and politically motivated executions. Complacency or misplaced solidarity with Iran should not stand in the way of demands for Iran to fulfil its human rights obligations.”

Amnesty International’s analysis includes examples that illustrate Iran’s failure to uphold human rights, such as that those to a fair trial, to freedom of expression and, in the case of women and ethnic and religious minorities, to freedom from discrimination, and highlights obfuscations in the Iranian government report.

Iran’s report states that it prohibits the use of torture to force “confessions” but the reality is very different. Torture and other ill-treatment for the purpose of extracting “confessions” are widespread. Recent Iranian broadcasts of extracts of “show trials” taking place in Tehran, show haggard-looking defendants apologizing and delivering what appear to be coerced “confessions”.

Iran’s judicial system is not the independent force depicted in the government’s report, with sensitive cases heavily influenced by political considerations. It also discriminates against women from top to bottom. Women are absent in any of the senior, decision-making posts, while a woman’s testimony in court is worth only half that of a man’s and she receives only half the compensation of a man for bodily injury or death.

Amnesty International’s report criticizes Iran’s failure to engage with human rights organizations and UN human rights experts, consistently stalling on allowing visits - contrary to Iran’s own assertions that it has co-operated with human rights groups. Amnesty International has been denied access to Iran to conduct first-hand research into human rights violations since April 1979.

Several human rights bills, currently pending before the Majles, have been under consideration for years without progress. These include the Juvenile Crimes Investigation Bill, which could reduce the number of death sentences imposed on juvenile offenders, and the bill setting out “political crimes” which was drafted over five years ago, by a previous parliament.

Amnesty International acknowledged some of the improvements in legislation referred to in Iran’s report to the UN. These include the revival of the Offices of the Prosecutor, the equalization of diyeh for Muslims with non-Muslims and efforts to combat human trafficking.

“It is time for Iran to implement the necessary measures to improve human rights in the country by allowing human rights defenders to work without fear, journalists to freely report, people to protest without being exposed to violence and ensuring mechanisms are developed to improve justice and ensure accountability,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

A full copy of Amnesty International’s shadow report Amnesty International’s Comments on the National Report presented by the Islamic Republic of Iran for the Universal Periodic Reviewis available at http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE13/021/2010/en

A copy of Amnesty International’s Submission of the Universal Periodic Review of Iran is available at http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE13/009/2009